Policy Updates

What's at Stake in Federal Farm Policy

MGC believes NOFA-NH's recent policy brief best details the missteps and potential fallout of Senate-backed AgriBusiness policy in the Farm Bill and its impact on small farms, a food resilient future, and the environment. It equally and successfully addresses next steps and actions YOU can take TODAY to PUSH BACK.

WE can change this. It will take time, perseverance, and patience. That is the truth.
From NOFA-NH
Policy Brief: Corporate Consolidation and Greenwashing in U.S. Agriculture
Published June 30, 2026

The Triple Threat of Coordinated Actions: Monsanto v. Durnell, the Senate Farm Bill, and the Executive Order on Regenerative Agriculture



This week witnessed a highly coordinated, multi-branch reinforcement of corporate dominance over the U.S. food system by our government. While we support a just transition toward sustainable food systems, current federal actions do the exact opposite. A truly resilient and healthy food system must confront the socioeconomics of agriculture—namely, the record closures of family farms driven by skyrocketing land, equipment, and input costs alongside depressed pay prices. This is not just an agronomy problem; it is a socioeconomic crisis as well. Farmers require a structural transition pathway that supports both ecological practice and financial viability without deepening debt.

Instead, the federal government has created an alarming loophole allowing corporations to escape accountability for damage to our ecosystems and human health. The recent Supreme Court ruling shields Monsanto/Bayer from liability for pesticide harm, while the administration simultaneously shifts federal focus away from regulated organic systems and toward unregulated “regenerative agriculture”—a framework that allows the continuous use of glyphosate under the guise of eco-efficiency. In addition, the prioritization of capital-intensive precision agriculture continues to push producers deeper into debt while enriching tech monopolies and patent holders, leaving the unfair political economy of industrial farming untouched.

Furthermore, the administration’s cancellation of the Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP) last year—which successfully supported farmers nationwide in transitioning away from chemical-intensive agriculture—signals a glaring contradiction. Rather than diverting funds to a separate initiative, federal investments for regenerative research can and should be directed straight into the Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (OREI). OREI must be fully funded and expanded to pioneer real agroecological advancements, ensuring ecological integrity remains at the core of all climate-focused research.

These actions represent a highly coordinated effort to funnel public funding to agribusiness conglomerates under the guise of ‘regenerative agriculture’ and sustainability, while stripping away regulatory oversight. Redirecting funding to unregulated ‘regenerative’ practices, coupled with the erosion of the National Organic Program, mirrors regulatory rollbacks that have consistently failed the public interest in banking and other major industries. We cannot make our communities or ecosystems healthy or our farms viable until we move away from chemical-intensive regimes. Farmers need active support to transition—including robust agronomy, stable markets, and infrastructure funding—much of which has been gutted by the current administration’s recent cuts to USDA development programs.

Policy Brief: Corporate Consolidation and Greenwashing in U.S. Agriculture
Published June 30, 2026

The Triple Threat of Coordinated Actions: Monsanto v. Durnell, the Senate Farm Bill, and the Executive Order on Regenerative Agriculture



1. Supreme Court Ruling:

Monsanto Co. v. Durnell (SCOTUS, June 25, 2026)In a devastating 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) expressly preempts state-law failure-to-warn claims.

The Impact: This ruling effectively blocks thousands of pending lawsuits by farmworkers and consumers who developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma from exposure to glyphosate (Roundup). By declaring that EPA-approved labels override state-level consumer protection laws, the Court has stripped individuals of their primary legal recourse for toxic exposure.

Action Alert: Demand Congress act immediately to restore the right to sue. Congress can amend FIFRA to explicitly state that EPA label approval does not block state product liability or failure-to-warn lawsuits, or create an explicit federal right of action for individuals harmed by toxic pesticides. While lawmakers have introduced the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act and the Pesticide Injury Accountability Act to reverse corporate liability shields, many Northeast Senators or Congressional representatives need to hear from us to get them to sign on as cosponsors.

2. The Senate Draft of the Farm Bill (Released Tuesday, June 23, 2026)

The current iterations of the Senate Farm Bill continue a decades-long addiction to heavily subsidizing commodity crops (corn, soy, cotton) that fuel industrial monoculture, concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), and chemical-intensive farming.

Perpetuating Corporate Control: By prioritizing high crop insurance subsidies and tying commodity safety nets to payments per farm, the bill disproportionately enriches mega-agribusinesses while driving small, independent, and historically marginalized farmers off their land.

The Erasure of Equity and Nutrition: Despite years of advocacy calling for land access, debt relief for BIPOC farmers, and structural support for underserved food systems, the Senate version reinforces the status quo, ignoring equity. Furthermore, the bill fails to restore the devastating cuts to nutrition programs.

Policy Brief: Corporate Consolidation and Greenwashing in U.S. Agriculture
Published June 30, 2026

The Triple Threat of Coordinated Actions: Monsanto v. Durnell, the Senate Farm Bill, and the Executive Order on Regenerative Agriculture



3. The Executive Co-optation: EO on Advancing Regenerative Agriculture (June 25, 2026)

The President’s newly issued Executive Order ostensibly addresses “farm resilience,” but structurally codifies corporate greenwashing under the loose term of “regenerative agriculture.”

The Organic vs. Regenerative Irony: Unlike certified Organic agriculture, which mandates strict federal restrictions against synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, Regenerative agriculture has no legally enforced standard prohibiting synthetics. The EO leverages this loophole to position “chemical efficiency” and “precision agriculture” as environmental wins while allowing the ongoing, unchecked application of synthetic inputs.

Protecting the Chemical Paradigm: Section 2 of the EO explicitly instructs the EPA to expedite “alternatives to older active ingredients” rather than encouraging a holistic transition away from chemical dependency. It focuses on managing and evaluating “cumulative exposure” via research frameworks rather than eliminating toxic inputs at the source.

The Corporate Accountability Loophole

The recent actions from the executive branches of government form a loophole that protects corporate interests at every stage of the agricultural pipeline:

Senate Farm Bill → Subsidizes mass industrial monoculture & chemical use. Executive Order → Rebrands this chemical use as eco-friendly “Regenerative Ag.” SCOTUS Ruling → Strips citizens of the right to sue when those chemicals cause harm.

Policy Brief: Corporate Consolidation and Greenwashing in U.S. Agriculture
Published June 30, 2026

The Triple Threat of Coordinated Actions: Monsanto v. Durnell, the Senate Farm Bill, and the Executive Order on Regenerative Agriculture



Call For Action

We reject the false solutions proposed by this administration and present a counter-narrative around five core demands:

  1. Expose the Greenwashing Loophole: Call out the deliberate political shift from “Organic” (highly regulated, no toxic synthetics) to “Regenerative” (unregulated, corporate-friendly). We must demand that any federal funding for regenerative practices include strict, measurable phase-outs of toxic synthetic pesticides and fertilizers.
  2. Reject Capital-Intensive Tech Mandates: Oppose the weaponization of “precision agriculture” as a climate solution when it acts primarily as a wealth transfer from farmers to technology patent-holders. Demand federal funding frameworks that prioritize farmer-led innovation, open-source agroecological research, and localized knowledge creation.
  3. Legislative Fix for Pesticide Immunity: Urge Congress to pass explicit legislation overriding the Durnell preemption decision, clarifying that federal pesticide law is a floor—not a ceiling—for consumer and farmworker protection. Specifically require Congress to pass the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act and the Pesticide Injury Accountability Act.
  4. No Structural Funding Without Equity: Pivot our Farm Bill pressure toward stripping commodity subsidies from mega-corporations and shifting those funds into mandatory, permanent funding for local food systems, structural land access for beginning and BIPOC farmers, and true agroecological models that address the unfair political economy squeezing farm prices.
  5. Reject All Cuts to SNAP: Restore the devastating cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and eliminate provisions that shift federal administrative costs onto cash-strapped state budgets. Food security and agricultural policy are inseparable.

The Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire (NOFA-NH) actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. We help people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

The New Hampshire Legislative Process

1

Idea Someone has an idea and a lawmaker sponsors it. Ideas come from everywhere and cover everything, from shoreland protection to designating the state fruit.

2

Legislative Service Requests (LSRs) In one sentence, lawmakers reserve bills on a specific topic. An LSR may say something like "To determine the appropriate governance of shorelands." Each year about 1,000 LSRs are reserved.

3

Written New ideas are typically written into bills after the LSR is reserved. Bills usually become publicly available from early winter through late winter.

4

Introduction After a bill is written, it is introduced in the chamber in which the sponsoring member belongs. Every bill is introduced.

5

Referred to Committee Once introduced, each bill will be referred to a committee of the chamber in which it's been introduced. A committee is a group of five to twenty lawmakers. The Senate has twelve and the House has about twenty-nine.

6

Public Hearing Each committee will hold a public hearing on each bill. Any member of the public may testify and/or provide written remarks.

7

Deliberation Once the public hearing is closed, the committee members discuss amongst themselves before voting on a bill, either immediately or at a later work session. Anyone may attend deliberations and work sessions, but may not speak (unless spoken to).

8

Vote After public hearing and deliberation, and possibly a work session, the committee votes. The committee will vote that the bill: (a) Ought to Pass; (b) Ought to Pass with Amendment; or (c) is Inexpedient to Legislate.

9

Stuck in Committee Committees can ask to keep a bill for further study, which could mean more study or could mean the death of the idea.

10

On to the Floor Every bill gets to the floor where the full chamber votes on it. The full chamber usually adopts the committee's recommendation. Occasionally, the full chamber's consideration of the bill is messy and a "floor fight" ensues.

11

Next Committee or End of the Road After the first chamber vote, if a bill is passed the bill will be referred to either: (a) a different committee in the same chamber; or (b) to the other chamber at cross over.

12

Repeat Whether a bill is referred to a committee in the same chamber, or if crossing over, the entire process from step 5 to step 11 is repeated.

13

Conference Sometimes, the House and Senate pass different versions of similar bills. In that case, members from the House and the Senate meet together to develop a common version of the bill.

14

Governor's Desk All bills that have been passed go to the Governor, who has three options: (a) sign the bill, in which case it becomes law immediately; (b) allow five days to pass without signing the bill, in which case the bill becomes law after the five days; or (c) veto the bill.

Current Legislative Service Requests

Food Access Hub Updates

Learn more

Farm to School Updates

Learn more

Policy Updates

Learn More